Formulation and Evaluation of Oro-dispersible tablets
of an Antihypertensive drug using Superdisintegrants
Syed Shariff
Miyan*, Vazir Ashfaq Ahamed, Prof. Mohammed Khaleel and Mohammed Yakhoob H.
M.M.U. College of Pharmacy, Ramanagara-562 159, Karnataka,
INDIA
ABSTRACT:
All
formulation showed weight variation and drug content within the acceptable
limits. The results revealed that sublimation of camphor from the tablets
resulted in highly porous tablets with dispersion time less than 30 seconds and
rapid in-vitro dissolution. The optimized formulation (F6) showed desired
disintegration time and good release profile with maximum drug being released
at different time intervals.
It
was concluded that oro-dispersible tablets of Ramipril with improved drug dissolution can be prepared by
solid dispersions of the drug with PEG-6000 and a combination of superdisintegrants was proved more optimized compare to
single superdisintegrant. Camphor can be used to
produce highly porous tablets for the ease of quicker disintegration and
dissolution. The present work helped in understanding the effect of formulation
variables especially combination of superdisintegrants
on the drug release profile, potentials for rapid dispersion, quicker
absorption, improved bioavailability, effective therapy and improved patient
compliance.
KEYWORDS: Oro-dispersible tablets, Ramipril, PEG-6000, Solid dispersion, Subliming agent, Superdisintegrants.
INTRODUCTION:
The tablet is the most widely used dosage form
because of its convenience in terms of self-administration, compactness, and
ease in manufacturing. However,
geriatric, bedridden and pediatric patients felt difficulty in swallowing conventional
tablets. To overcome this drawback, innovative drug delivery systems known as
fast dissolving tablets have developed. A tablet which can rapidly disintegrate
in saliva (rapidly disintegrating tablet) is an attractive dosage form and patient-oriented pharmaceutical preparation. The concept of
rapid disintegrating drug delivery system emerged from the desire to provide
patients with conventional mean of taking their medication. Dysphagia
(difficulty in swallowing) is a common problem of all age groups, especially
elderly and pediatrics, because of the physiological changes associated with
these groups of patients2.
Other categories that experience problems using
conventional oral dosage forms includes the nauseated, mentally ill, and non
co-operative patients, those with motion sickness, sudden episodes of allergic
or asthma attack where an ultra-rapid onset of action is required3. Mouth dissolving tablet improved compliance in patients. The
potential advantages such tablets include, administration without water,
anywhere, anytime lead to their suitability to geriatric and pediatric
patients. They are also suitable for the mentally ill, the bedridden and
patients who do not have easy access to water. The benefits, in terms of
patient compliance, rapid onset of action, increased bioavailability, and the
tablets that can rapidly dissolve or disintegrate in the oral cavity have
attracted a greater deal of attention4.
Therefore an effort to increase dissolution of drug
is often needed. Methods available to improve dissolution include salt
formation, micronization and addition of solvent or
surface active agents. Solid dispersion is one of such methods and it involves
a dispersion of one or more active ingredients in an inner carrier or matrix in
solid state prepared by melting, dissolution in solvent or melting-solvent
method etc. Solid dispersion technology has been successfully been used for
improving the solubility of the poorly soluble drugs and hence bioavailability
of such drugs5-8.
Superdisintegrants such as Sodium starch Glycolate (SSG), Crosspovidone
(CP) and crosscarmellose sodium (CCS) were extensively
used to fabricate mouth dissolving tablets. Subliming agents such as Menthol,
Camphor, mannitol, Urea etc, were included in the
blend as subliming agent and tablets were first prepared and later exposed to
vacuum to produce highly porous tablets which may either dissolve in the buccal
cavity or get dispersed in the mouth for quicker, better and total release of the medicament
for absorption9-11
Ramipril15-17 is a 2-azabicyclo [3.3.0]
octane3carboxylic acid derivative. It is a white, crystalline substance
soluble in polar organic solvents and buffered aqueous solutions. Ramipril melts between 105°C to 112°C. Ramipril
Capsules USP is indicated for the treatment of hypertension. It may be used
alone or in combination with diuretics such as thiazide.
The recommended initial dose for patients not receiving a diuretic is 2.5 mg
once a day.
Ramipril is a long-acting angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor. It is a prodrug that is transformed in the liver to its active
metabolite ramiprilat. Both ramipril
and ramiprilat inhibit ACE in human subjects and
animals. Angiotensin converting enzyme is a peptidyl dipeptidase that catalyzes the conversion of angiotensin I
to the vasoconstrictor substance, angiotensin II. Angiotensin II also
stimulates aldosterone secretion by the adrenal cortex. Inhibition of ACE
results in decreased plasma angiotensin II, which leads to decreased vasopressor activity and to decrease aldosterone secretion.
Following oral administration of Ramipril,
peak plasma concentrations (Cmax) of Ramipril are reached within one hour. The extent of
absorption is at least 50% to 60% and is not significantly influenced by the
presence of food in the gastrointestinal tract, although the rate of absorption
is reduced.
The
primary objective of fast dissolving tablets is to disintegrate or dissolve
rapidly in oral cavity within short
period of 15-60 seconds, without need of water and should have pleasant after
feel in the mouth. The important parameters to formulate a fast dissolving
tablet are choice of superdisintegrants and
optimization of concentration of superdisintegrants
used.
The present work aims to investigate the potential
of the solid dispersion and vacuum drying technique for development of oro-dispersible tablets of Ramipril
using, sodium starch Glycolate, Crosspovidone
and crosscarmellose sodium as superdisintegrants.
MATERIALS AND METHOD:
Materials: Ramipril was obtained as a gift sample from Lupin Pharmaceuticals Limited, India. Crosscarmellose, Crosspovidone
and sodium starch Glycolate were obtained as gift
samples from micro labs, India. Other materials such as; PEG-6000, Talc-IP, Magnesium stearate-IP
and Camphor were of AR Grade and were purchased from S.D.Fine
Lab., Mumbai.
Preparation of Solid
Dispersion: SD of Ramipril:
PEG 6000 at 1:2 weight ratios was prepared by the solvent evaporation method. Ramipril was dissolved in 1 part of ethanol, and the
polymer was dissolved in 2 part of purified water. The solutions were mixed
with the help of magnetic stirring for 30 minutes. Then, the solvent was
evaporated under reduced pressure and dried at 400C until constant
weight. The dried material was powdered, sieved through no # 40 mesh and then
stored in a dessicator at room temperature for
further study.
Preparation
of fast disintegrating tablets of Ramipril
The ingredients (as shown in
Table 1) were passed through a screen
(40 mesh) prior to mixing. Powdered solid dispersion containing amount
equivalent to 2.5 mg Ramipril, was mixed with the
appropriate concentrations of superdisintegrants and
filler then co-grounded in a mortar for 15 minutes. Talc and magnesium stearate were added and mixed for 10 minutes in a polybag. The mixed blend of drug and excipient
was compressed into tablets using a 12mm flat punch tablet machine (Kambert, Ahmadabad, India) to produce tablets weighing ~250mg. Sublimation of camphor from the tablets was performed under
vacuum at 50°C for 8 hours.
Table 1; Showing
composition of Oro-dispersible tablets of Ramipril
|
Ingredients (mg) |
F1 |
F2 |
F3 |
F4 |
F5 |
F6 |
|
Solid dispersion containing 2.5 mg of Ramipril |
7.5 |
7.5 |
7.5 |
7.5 |
7.5 |
7.5 |
|
Crosscarmellose sodium (CCS) |
12.5 |
--- |
---- |
12.5 |
---- |
12.5 |
|
Crospovidone (CP) |
---- |
12.5 |
---- |
12.5 |
12.5 |
---- |
|
Sodium starch glycolate
(SSG) |
---- |
---- |
12.5 |
---- |
12.5 |
12.5 |
|
Camphor |
12.5 |
12.5 |
12.5 |
12.5 |
12.5 |
12.5 |
|
Saccharin sodium |
2.5 |
2.5 |
2.5 |
2.5 |
2.5 |
2.5 |
|
Talc |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
|
Magnesium stearate |
2.0 |
2.0 |
2.0 |
2.0 |
2.0 |
2.0 |
|
Lactose |
212 |
212 |
212 |
199.5 |
199.5 |
199.5 |
|
Total weight of the tablet (mg) |
250 |
250 |
250 |
250 |
250 |
250 |
Table 3; showing pre-compressive
parameters of the blend, n=3
|
Formulation
code |
Angle of
repose |
Loose bulk density (g/ml) |
Tapped bulk density (g/ml) |
Hausner’s factor |
Carr’s Index (%) |
|
F1 F2 F3 F4 F5 F6 |
29.36±0.02 28.46±0.01 27.43±0.01 28.37±0.06 29.90±0.03 28.96±0.04 |
0.2456±0.02 0.2326±0.006 0.242±0.003 0.242±0.004 0.2382±0.004 0.2480±0.003 |
0.291±0.004 0.283±0.004 0.283±0.004 0.284±0.006 0.278±0.004 0.283±0.005 |
1.186±0.02 1.190±
0.22 1.202±
0.14 1.224±
0.04 1.240±
0.14 1.154±
0.02 |
17.89±1.04 18.34±0.83 16.80±1.23 18.30±0.80 19.57±1.10 18.25±1.06 |
Tan
θ = h / r or θ= tan-1 [ h / r ]
EVALUATION
OF ORO-DISPERSIBLE RAMIPRIL TABLETS:
I) Evaluation for pre-compressive
parameters:12
1)
Bulk Density: Blends were
poured gently through a glass funnel into a graduated cylinder at exactly to 10
ml mark. Excess blend was removed using a spatula and the weight of the
cylinder with blend required for filling the cylinder volume was calculated.
The cylinder was then tapped over hard wooden slab from a height of 2.0cm until
the time when there was no more decrease in the volume.
Both loose bulk density and tapped bulk density, and thereby Hausner’s factor and Carr’s compressibility indices were
calculated by using following equations;
a) Loose bulk Density:.
Loose bulk Density = ![]()
b) Tapped
bulk Density:
Tapped bulk Density = ![]()
2) Hausner’s
factor:
Hausner’s factor = ![]()
3)
Carr’s Compressibility Index:
Percent Carr’s Index =
![]()
4)
Angle of Repose: For determination of angle of repose (ө), the
blends were poured through a funnel, which was fixed at a position such that
its lower tip was at a height of exactly 2.0 cm above the surface. The blends
were poured till the time when upper tip of the pile surface touched the lower
tip of the funnel. The tan-1 of the (height of the pile/radius of
its base) gave the angle of repose. The
results of pre-compressive parameters are given in Table 3.
II)
Evaluation for post -compressive parameters:13,14
(a) Thickness and diameter:, thickness and diameter of each tablet was measured
using a calibrated dial caliper.
(b) Weight variation test: Twenty tablets were taken and their weight was determined
individually and collectively on a digital weighing balance. The average weight
of each tablet was determined from the sum of weight of twenty tablets. Mean and standard deviation (S.d)
of weight was calculated from each batch.
(c) Hardness test: Hardness was determined by taking six tablets from each formulation,
using a Monsanto Hardness Tester. A mean of S.d
values were calculated for each batch.
(d) Friability test: Six
pre-weighed tablets were rotated at 25 rpm for 4 minutes using a Roche Friabilator. The tablets were de-dusted and re-weighed
using digital weighing balance and the percentage weight loss was calculated by
using the equation;
F =
× 100
(e) Wetting time and
water absorption ratio:
A piece of whatman filter paper folded twice was kept in a Petri dish
(internal diameter 4 cm) containing 6 ml of purified water. A tablet having a
small amount of Rosaline dye powder on the upper surface was placed on the
tissue paper. When the upper surface of the tablet acquires a red colour, the time was recorded as wetting time. The same procedure without using Rosaline dye was
followed to determine the water absorption ratio R, was determined according to
the following equation. Above experiments were performed in triplicate.
R = [(Wa –
Wb) / Wb] × 100
Where, Wa
and Wb were the weights of the
tablet after and before the tests.
(f) Disintegration time: [1]
Disintegration time was
measured in 900 ml simulated gastric fluid (without enzymes) maintained at
37±0.5o C by USP 24 method (without disc). The disintegration time
of 6 individual tablets were recorded and the average was taken.
(g) Drug content estimation: [18]
● Standard solution: 25 mg of pure Ramipril was dissolved in little quantity of
Methanol in a volumetric flask and then the volume was made to 25ml mark with
Methanol and sonicated for 5 minutes. The above
solution will give 1mg/ml solution of Ramipril which
was further diluted with Methanol (1ml was diluted to 100ml) to produce a stock
solution containing 10 µg/ml of Ramipril. The above
stock solution of Ramipril was further diluted with
Methanol to produce a series of concentrations ranging between 0.6 to 16µg/ml.
Absorbance was measured spectrophotometrically at 226nm against Methanol as
blank.
● Sample solution: 20 tablets from each batch were randomly selected and
were weighed accurately and then finely powdered. To a powder equivalent to
25mg of Ramipril about 50ml of Methanol was added and
dissolved with the aid of shaker for 15 minutes; sufficient quantity of
Methanol was added to produce 250 ml in a volumetric flask, mixed well and
filtered.
To 1ml of the above filtrate was further
diluted to 100ml using Methanol and mixed well. The absorbance of the resulting
solution (1µg/ml) was measured at the 226nm using blank in the reference
cell. The total content of drug in the solution was calculated with the help of
standard graph. The above experiment was done in triplicate.
(h) In vitro dissolution study
The
release of drug from ODT was determined using USP dissolution testing apparatus
type II (paddle method; ELECTROLABS, INDIA). The
dissolution test was performed using 900 ml of simulated gastric fluid (without
enzyme) at 37 ± 0.5°C and 50 rpm. A sample (10 ml) of the solution was
withdrawn from the dissolution apparatus at different time intervals and the
samples were replaced with fresh dissolution medium. The samples were filtered
through a 0.45μ membrane filter and appropriately diluted to produce
suitable concentration with simulated gastric fluid. Absorbance of these
solutions was measured at 226nm using a Shimadzu UV-1700 double beam
spectrophotometer. Cumulative percentage drug
release was calculated using an equation obtained from a standard calibration
curve (see figure 1). The results of
post-compressive parameters are shown in table
4. The cumulative percent drug release from the tablets is shown in figure 2 and table 5.
(Figure;1
standard calibration curve of drug in methanol)
(i)Accelerated
stability studies [19,20,21]
Short
term accelerated stability study was performed
on the prepared ODT formulation to investigate stability of formulation
and it also gives evidence of the drug - excipients
interaction in terms of physical and chemical changes (see table 2). The stability study involved storing the prepared
formulation in below mentioned conditions for a period of 2 months and the
tablets were evaluated at different time intervals for any physical and
chemical changes.
The
procedure was divided into two parts;
Part
I:
Achieving
of 60% RH:
26.66
gm of sodium hydroxide was weighed and dissolved in 100 ml of distilled water
to get 26.66% sodium hydroxide solution. The solution was placed in the
desiccator over which a wire mesh was placed, over which the dosage form was
placed and the desiccator was sealed. The desiccator was placed in the oven
maintained at 250C to create the relative Humidity of 60%.
(Table 4 showing post-compressive parameters of oro-dispersible
tablets of ramipril, n=3)
|
|
Before
vacuum drying |
After vacuum drying to sublimate camphor |
|||||
|
Formulation code |
Average Weight (mg |
Hardness (kg/cm2) |
Friability (%) |
Disintegration Time (sec) |
Wetting Time (sec) |
Water absorption ratio |
Drug content (%) |
|
F1 F2 F3 F4 F5 F6 |
249.20±0.008 251.18±0.122 250.10±0.029 252.00±0.028 251.77±0.121 250.88±0.030 |
3.2±0.04 3.1±0.14 3.2±0.02 3.3±0.08 3.2±0.40 3.6±0.22 |
0.61±0.04 0.65±0.08 0.65±0.05 0.88±0.24 0.78±0.33 0.87±0.15 |
38±2.00 40±2.04 29±0.08 27±2.04 23±0.04 22±0.28 |
28±0.09 31±0.06 26±0.55 27±0.33 24±0.07 22±0.56 |
122±0.13 116±0.11 102±0.22 122±0.14 118±0.16 132±0.20 |
98.66±0.14 99.24±0.68 98.22±0.22 98.16±0.66 99.04±0.55 98.79±0.27 |
Achieving
of 75% RH:
Saturated
solution of sodium chloride was prepared and placed in the desiccator over a
wire mesh, above which the dosage form was placed and the desiccator was
sealed. The desiccator was kept in oven maintained at 400C to create
the relative humidity of 75%.
Part
II
The
sealed formulation were placed in amber colored bottles, tightly plugged with
cotton and capped. They were then stored at 250C /60% RH and 400C
/ 75% RH for two months and
evaluated for their physical appearance and drug content.
Table 2: Conditions for stability studies according to ICH
guidelines
|
Type of study |
Storage condition |
Minimum time |
|
|
Temperature |
Relative humidity (%) |
||
|
Long term |
250C±20C |
60% ±5% RH |
12 Months |
|
Intermediate |
300± 20C |
65%± 5% RH |
6 Months |
|
Accelerated |
400± 20C |
75%± 5% RH |
6 Months |
(J) Drug: Excipient
Compatibility study:
To establish drug-excipients compatibility, binary powder mixtures were
prepared in 1:1 ratios with excipients. The binary
mixtures were ground in a mortar, screened and the mixtures were filled
individually in amber colored vials and sealed.
1.
After specific time period the mixture were
subjected to assay and all binary mixtures showed desired drug concentration
ranges.
2.
The IR spectra
were recorded using FT IR Spectrophotometer (Shimadzu 8400S, Japan) Potassium
bromide pressed pallet method was followed.
RESULT AND DISCUSSION:
In the present
investigation the solubility of Ramipril was enhanced
by treating with PEG-6000 (solvent evaporation method) and the ODTs of Ramipril were prepared by direct compression method. Before
compression, the measurement of qualitative and quantitative assessment of
internal cohesive and frictional forces under low levels of external loading
applied in mixing and tabelting was convinced through
angle of repose. The values for angle of repose were found in the range of 27.43 to
29.90°. Carr’s index of
the prepared blends falls in the range of 16.80 to 19.57% and this is also supported by Hausner’s
factor values which were in the range of 1.154 to 1.240. Hence the prepared blends possessed good flow properties
and can be used for manufacturing of tablets (see table 3).
All the tablets
were prepared under similar experimental conditions. All the formulations
exhibited white color, odorless, flat shaped with almost smooth surfaces (but
formed fine pores on all surfaces when subjected to vacuum drying). The average weight of the ODTs prepared by
direct compression method was 249.2 to 252.0mg
(before sublimation of camphor) and average weight after sublimation was found
between 237.2 to 240.0mg which
clearly indicated that the loss of camphor from each tablets may be around 12
to 12.1 mg per tablet (4.82%). Hardness of prepared
ODT tablets was between 3.1 to
3.6 kg/cm2.
The percent friability of formulations was found to be 0.61 to 0.88 (less than 1.0%) and
thus hardness and friability of all formulations were within acceptable limits.
The disintegration time is very important and it is desired to be less than 1
minute. The quick disintegration may assist swallowing and drug absorption in
buccal cavity, thus greater bioavailability of the drug. Disintegration time of
prepared ODTs was found in the range of 22 to 40 seconds and the order was:
F1 (CCS)<F2
(CP)<F3 (SSG)< F4 (CCS+CP) <F5(CP+SSG) <F6 (CCS+SSG)
The above
finding indicated that, a combination of crosscarmellose
sodium (CCS) and sodium starch glycolate (SSG) in
appropriate concentrations showed least time for disintegration.
Wetting time is
the indicator from the ease of the tablet disintegration in buccal cavity. It
was observed that wetting time of tablets was in the range of 22 to 31 seconds. It was found that the nature and
combination of the superdisintegrants(s) present affected
the wetting of the tablets. The formulation containing combination of CCS with SSG
(F6) took less time while tablets containing CP alone (F2) took more time to
get wet.
Assay for the
prepared formulations was performed in triplicate to determine drug content
uniformity and it was found between 98.16
to 99.24% (see table 4).
In vitro
dissolution study was performed by using simulated gastric fluid (without
enzymes) as dissolution medium using USP dissolution apparatus type 2 at a paddle speed of 50rpm.
At the end of 60 minutes the cumulative percentage drug release from various
ODT was found to be 78.22, 76.44, 78.28, 80.82, 83.77 and 90.44% from F1, F2,
F3, F4, F5 and F6 respectively. This clearly indicated that the superdisintegrants present alone released lower amount of
drug compare to the tablets containing double disintegrants
(see table 5 and figure 2). The formulation F6
which contained double superdisintegrants released
maximum drug when compared to other formulations. With reference to type and
combination of superdisintegrants present, the order
of release was as follows;
F6 > F5 >
F4 > F1 > F2
> F3
The
results of short term stability studies indicated that there were no major
changes in the physical properties such as colour, odour, and texture and disintegration time. Drug content
was found under acceptable limits for all ODT formulation (see table 6).
Drug-excipient
interaction study was performed using FT IR spectrophotometer (Shimadzu 8400S, Japan) the kneaded mixture of drug
and excipients was prepared and scanned; no excipient was interacted with the drug. The FT IR spectra
of pure drug and optimized formulation (F6) are shown in figure 3, and 4.
Table:5, In-vitro cumulative %
release of drug from oro-dispersible tablets of Ramipril, n=3
|
Time in minutes |
Cumulative % drug release from prepared tablets
|
|||||
|
Formulation
code |
||||||
F1
|
F2
|
F3
|
F4 |
F5 |
F6 |
|
0
|
0.0
|
0.0
|
0.0
|
0.0
|
0.0
|
0.0
|
5
|
6.882(±1.88)
|
5.172(±1.25)
|
6.065(±0.22)
|
7.544(±1.23)
|
9.123(±0.50)
|
8.222(±0.622)
|
10
|
10.884(±1.66)
|
8.405(±0.67)
|
12.529(±1.24)
|
14.660(±1.37)
|
15.660(±1.25)
|
15.662(±0.204)
|
15
|
16.228(±1.44)
|
12.215(±1.24)
|
21.022(±1.58)
|
22.177(±1.44)
|
22.440(±1.43)
|
25.222(±1.28)
|
20
|
24.228(±1.44)
|
19.012(±1.60)
|
30.234(±1.16)
|
28.402(±1.06)
|
28.660(±1.15)
|
33.442(±0.90)
|
25
|
32.666(±1.08)
|
27.413(±1.24)
|
36.462(±0.54)
|
36.225(±1.33)
|
38.662(±1.17)
|
41.780(±1.12)
|
30
|
38.245(±1.44)
|
35.654(±1.67)
|
40.706(±2.67)
|
43.343(±2.10)
|
43.128(±0.54)
|
48.542(±1.66)
|
35
|
47.246(±1.46)
|
43.655(±1.28)
|
50.233(±1.64)
|
49.566(±1.37)
|
53.015(±1.24)
|
57.442(±0.80)
|
40
|
55.442(±0.98)
|
53.224(±0.61)
|
58.660(±1.36)
|
56.290(±1.35)
|
60.773(±1.24)
|
62.884(±0.12)
|
45
|
64.222(±0.22)
|
60.126(±0.66)
|
63.956(±1.28)
|
65.666(±1.1)
|
67.212(±0.08)
|
71.462(±1.80)
|
50
|
70.662(±0.44)
|
71.346(±0.98)
|
70.222(±1.29)
|
73.284(±0.80)
|
73.192(±0.55)
|
80.220(±0.12)
|
55
|
74.11(±0.55)
|
72.22(±1.16)
|
72.35(±0.98)
|
78.48(±0.64)
|
80.44(±0.26)
|
85.28(±0.90)
|
60
|
78.42(±1.26)
|
76.44(±1.66)
|
75.28(±0.64)
|
81.82(±1.10)
|
83.77(±0.90)
|
90.44(±1.66)
|
Table:6, Results of short term accelerated stability study
p=physical appearance(color, odour and texture), H=hardness,
%= percent drug content
|
TIME IN DAYS |
F1 |
F2 |
F3 |
F4 |
F5 |
F6 |
||||||||||||
|
P |
H |
% |
P |
H |
% |
P |
H |
% |
P |
H |
% |
P |
H |
% |
P |
H |
% |
|
|
0 DAYS |
+++ |
3.2 |
98.60 |
+++ |
3.1 |
99.24 |
+++ |
3.2 |
98.22 |
+++ |
3.3 |
98.16 |
+++ |
3.2 |
99.04 |
+++ |
3.6 |
98.79 |
|
30 DAYS |
+++ |
3.1 |
98.57 |
+++ |
3.1 |
98.26 |
+++ |
3.2 |
98.11 |
+++ |
3.2 |
98.12 |
+++ |
3.2 |
99.00 |
+++ |
3.5 |
98.70 |
|
60 DAYS |
+++ |
3.1 |
98.56 |
+++ |
3.0 |
98.25 |
+++ |
3.2 |
98.15 |
+++ |
3.2 |
98.13 |
+++ |
3.2 |
99.01 |
+++ |
3.5 |
98.73 |
(Figure:2 showing dissolution profile of fabricated oro-dispersible tablets of Ramipril)
(Figure:3, FT IR spectra of pure drug Ramipril)
(Figure 4, FT IR spectra of optimized
formulation, F6)
CONCLUSION:
In
the present investigation it can be concluded that the oro-dispersible
tablets of Ramipril (F6 was the optimized formulation)
can be successfully prepared by using
solid dispersions of the drug in PEG 6000 and then blending with
suitable proportions of two superdisintegrants such
as; crosscarmellose sodium (CCS) and sodium starch glycolate (SSG). After direct compression, sublimation of
camphor provides highly porous tablets which can disintegrate quickly to
achieve complete and effective dissolution. In
vivo studies are required to correlate in
vitro release data and to access the taste of prepared oro-dispersible
tablets.
AKNOWLEDGEMENTS:
The
author wish to thank Prof. Mohammed Khaleel, Principal,
M. M. U. College of Pharmacy for providing facilities to carry out this
research work
REFERENCES:
1.
Abdelbary G, Eouani C, Prinderre P, Joachim J, Reynier
J, Piccerelle P. Determination of the in-vitro disintegration profile of
rapidly disintegrating tablets and correlation with oral disintegration. Int J Pharm 2005; 292:29-41.
2.
Lindgreen S, Janzon L. Dysphagia: Prevalence of swallowing complaints and clinical
finding. Med Clin North Am 1993; 77:3-5.
3.
Kaushik D, Dureja S, Saini TR. Mouth Dissolving Tablets- A Review. Indian Drugs
2003;41:187-93.
4.
Kuchekar BS, Badhan AC, Mahajan HS. Mouth dissolving tablets: A novel drug Delivery
system. Pharm Times 2003; 35:7-9.
5.
Modi A, Tayade P. Enhancement
of Dissolution Profile by Solid Dispersion (Kneading) Technique. AAPS PharmSciTech.
2006; 7(3): Article 68. DOI: 10.1208/pt070368
6.
Marin MT, Margarit MV, Salcedo GE. Characterization and solubility
study of solid dispersions of flunarizine and polyvinylpyrrolidone. Farmaco. 2002;57:723-727; PubMed DOI:
10.1016/S0014-827X(02)01262-4.
7.
Chiou
WL, Riegelman S. Pharmaceutical applications of solid
dispersion systems. J Pharm Sci.1971; 60: 1281-1302.
8.
Darío Leonardi, María Gabriela Barrera,
María Celina Lamas
and Claudio
Javier Salomón; “Development of prednisone: Polyethylene glycol 6000 fast-release
tablets from solid dispersions: Solid-state characterization, dissolution
behavior, and formulation parameters”; AAPS PharmSciTech;
Volume 8,Number4,221-228,
DOI: 10.1208/pt0804108.
9.
Shailesh Sharma,
New Generation of Tablet: Fast Dissolving
Tablet; available online; http// www. Pharmainfo.net.
10. Koizumi K, Watanabe Y, Morita
K, Utoguchi N, Matsumoto M. New
method of preparing high-porosity rapidly saliva soluble compressed tablets
using mannitol with camphor, a subliming material,
International Journal of Pharmaceutics 1997, 152(1): 127-131.
11. Gohel M, Patel M, Amin A, Agrawal R, Dave R, Bariya N. Formulation design and optimization of mouth
dissolve tablets of nimesulide using vacuum drying
technique, AAPS PharmSciTech 2004, 5(3): 10-15.
12. Yoshio, K., Masazumi, K., Shuichi A., and Hiroaki N.,2005,
Evaluation of rapidly disintegrating tablets manufactured by phase transition
of sugar alcohols, J. Control. Release, 105(1-2), 16-22.
13. Kuchekar, B. S., Mahajan,
S., and Bandhan, A. C., Mouth dissolve tablets of sumatriptan, Indian Drugs, 2004, 41(10), 592-598.
14. Lalla. J K., Mamania,
H. M., 2004, Fast dissolving rofecoxib
tablets, Indian J. Pharm. Sci.,59(4), 23-26.
15. Ramipril; available online at; http//
www. chemspider.com
16. Ramipril; available online at; http//
www.medlinePlus.com
17. http//www.Ramipril.com
18. Pratik Dash , S. N. Das, S. K. Mahapatra, S. K. Kar, M. M.
Annapurna; U.V. spectrophotometric method for the simultaneous estimation of hydrochlorthiazide and ramipril
in bulk and pharmaceutical dosage forms; Int J Pharm Sci Tech (© 2009) Vol-3,
Issue-2, July-Dec, 2009.
19. Kumar V. "Designing of
stability programme", The Eastern Pharmacist, 1992, 35(416),
29.
20. Stability testing of active pharmaceutical
ingredient and finished pharmaceutical product; available at; www.who.org
(accessed in 2009).
21. ICH, “Stability testing of new
drug substances and products Q1A (R2)”, International Conference on
Harmonization, IFPMA, Geneva, 1996.
Received on 10.06.2011
Accepted
on 01.08.2011
©
A&V Publication all right reserved
Research Journal of Pharmaceutical
Dosage Forms and Technology.
3(6): Nov.- Dec., 2011, 269-275